As you might have read from our article on Mashable earlier today, as part of our involvement in the Social-Loco conference we have done some research to try to understand the difference between what people are saying online compared to the actions of early adopters and the views of the rest of the US population when it comes to their mobile check-in habits.
The results give us a clear understanding of who the winners and losers are likely to be, as well as the types of things that will motivate the mass consumer to adopt location-based apps. They also highlight some of the real challenges there are to consumers embracing this technology.
(Click to zoom in)
Here is a summary of our research findings:
- Privacy is still a huge issue for the adoption of any applications that ask the consumer to disclose their location.
- Facebook and Groupon are well placed to exploit the Social-Loco opportunity through Facebook Places and GrouponNow respectively.
- Discounts and coupons are by far the largest single motivator for disclosing location. Status rewards, such as badges and being named “mayor,” are of little interest to the mass consumer.
- Whereas a lot of the focus to date has been around small local businesses benefitting from location-based technology, there is a huge opportunity for big brands that can connect with people at a local level.
- In the future, consumers are more likely to check-in at a friend’s house than they are to cafes, restaurants or bars.
Highlighted below are some of the statistics from the research:
Privacy Concerns
- 17% of the US population have checked-in using an app on their mobile device
- 49% of the population didn’t feel there was any real motivation to check-in
- 48% have never checked in due to privacy concerns
Which Apps Do /Would People Use?
- 90% of people who have checked-in have done so using Facebook Places
- 31% have disclosed their location on Twitter
- 22% have checked-in using Foursquare
- 6% have checked-in using Yelp or Gowalla
- 55% of people who have never checked-in would most likely use Facebook Places
- 40% would check-in using Groupon
- 6% would consider using Foursquare
Why Would People Check-in?
- 54% of early adopters and 41% of consumers cited deals and discounts as the single biggest reason to check-in.
- For people who currently check in, the next biggest reasons were meet friends (33%), learn about the location (32%), promote the location (30%), and to get a badge or become mayor (21%)
- For the mass consumer, after discounts, the next biggest motivation was to learn about the location (19%).
- 99% of consumers do not view simply getting a badge or becoming mayor as a motivation
Where People Check-In
- Consumers who currently check-in are most likely to check into a place that sells food and drink with the top destinations being restaurants (53%), Coffee shops/cafes (40%), hotels (38%) and Bars/clubs (36%)
- For the mass consumer, the most frequently mentioned check-in destination was homes of friends or family (35%), followed by restaurants (33%), new cities is neighborhoods (27%) and large general retail stores such as Walmart (23%)
- On average consumers are twice as like to check into a global chain or formula retail outlet than they are an independent store.
So What Does All This Mean For Brands?
I will go into in more detail into many of these different areas in follow-up to this post, but here are three key takeaways from our research:
1. Brands need to adopt a “Glocal” social media strategy in order to engage consumers in the next generation of mobile apps that leverage location-data
2. There is an opportunity for big brands to engage consumers in location-based apps by tapping into and combing multiple motivations (discounts, learning, promoting, meeting friends)
3. To reach beyond the early adopters, brands should focus their strategies around Facebook and Groupon as the two platforms that will most likely drive adoption


Pingback: Facebook Places Beats Foursquare In Location-Based Use
Pingback: Beyond the Check-In Hype: Unmotivated Users [Infographic] — NewsGrange
Pingback: Beyond the Check-In Hype: Unmotivated Users [Infographic] — NewsGrange
Pingback: The Curious Brain » Check- in data: The reality behind the hype
Pingback: The Merging of Location and Daily Deals = Possible Success | Street Fight
Pingback: Facebook places supera a Foursquare... y? | Gente IT
Pingback: links for 2011-05-06 « Unscrambled
Pingback: Foursquare Appears Unpopular Among NYU Students, Despite Monstrous Growth « babypen
Pingback: How people use check-in services, illustrated - TNW Social Media
Pingback: How people use check-in services, illustrated | Tech-Bubble
Pingback: How people use check-in services, illustrated / Brainyloft
Pingback: How people use check-in services, illustrated | souqdeals.com
Pingback: How people use check-in services, illustrated | BJD Productions Blog
Pingback: The reality behind the check-in / we are social
Pingback: Facebook Places & Foursquare: Why People Aren't Checking-in | Neworld Associates Blog
Pingback: marcustrotta.com » Infográfico: Quem realmente utiliza os serviços de localizacão (Check-In)?
Pingback: 通过 LBS 签到数据看用户行为 - 网旮旯里 | 把握最新动态,关注IT前沿
Pingback: Tattletech – tech news with twist » Blog Archive » Guest rant: Josh Mortensen from GlibHippo
Pingback: A Realidade por trás do Check-In | Focusview
Really great, informative study! Keep up the good work!
Pingback: The Reality Behind the “Check-In” Hype | Beyond | Bil Gaines
Pingback: Twitter Weekly Updates for 2011-05-15 | It is what it is
Hi Dr. Hargreaves,
I stumbled upon your blog post while searching #lbs on Twitter this morning – I’m extremely happy that I found it!
And while I don’t have an academic background anywhere near as impeccable as yours I did study study some of the motivational concerns you mentioned in your post during my master’s program at the University of Michigan’s School of Information (si.umich.edu/msi/iem.htm), where I focused on incentive centered design and social computing.
Your findings mentioned that the results give a clear understanding of who the winners and losers are likely to be. I was a bit taken back by how low the motivation to participate in games/contests were for the online conversation categories, especially in comparison to early adopters and mass consumers.
Would it be possible to get a copy of the research report? Or would you mind elaborating on the type of procedures you used in your research? Because I’m curious as to whether this data is based on surveys, observations or both.
One of your really cool findings highlight the difference between attitudes and behavior when mentioning who consumers thought they’d interact with more and who they actually did interact with more. I’m curious as to whether this applies to the motivations section as well. Is there a disconnect between what consumers think they’re motivated by and what they’re really motivated by?
Overall I really enjoyed your post and the visuals of the data was spot on. Thank for sharing this information!
Best,
Nate
Hi,
Great post! Really interesting findings. I’m just finishing my thesis at Stockholm University, about motivators behind social check-ins. Like Nate, I would love to get some info about your method and the number of people taking part in the research. That would be great and a big help for me in my work since there is not much research out there about the check-in hype.
Thanks again for a great post!
/Mattias Abrahamsson, Stockholm, Sweden, Europe.
Pingback: The Reality Behind the Check-in Hype
Pingback: Jigsaw LLC » Geolocation applications myths and truths » Jigsaw LLC
Pingback: To check in, or not to check in: that is the question… | ECCO International
Pingback: In the Spotlight: An Introduction to Foursquare for Business « 1911 MAIN STREET
Pingback: Check Out the Check-in Data! [INFOGRAPHIC] - Social Media Agency | mycleveragency | Social Media Agency | mycleveragency
Pingback: The reality behind the “check in” hype (Beyond)
Pingback: The Reality Behind the “Check-In” Hype | Beyond | e-marketing and design | Scoop.it
Pingback: Check Out the Check-in Data! [INFOGRAPHIC] - Social Media Agency London Manchester UK